USC CNTV589

USC -vs- OREGON: Mixed Emotions & Loyalties

In about four hours, USC will take on Oregon at the Coliseum here in Los Angeles. For the Trojans (7-1) it's their homecoming and for the Ducks (7-2) it's a final chance to prove they're still worthy of national attention. I'll be in the stands, sitting with my college dorm-mate Pete Feibleman and cheering on the Ducks like a maniacal partisan, because that's my college.

2003395355
Here Comes the Quack Attack
The University of Oregon Ducks Take on the USC Trojans

On the other side of the equation, though, I'm currently an adjunct professor at USC, teaching CNTV589, a graduate level class about producing that draws students from both the School of Cinematic Arts and the Marshall School of Business here at the University fo Southern California. Added to that is the fact that my oldest son currently attends USC, and my wife got her graduate degree from USC.

I could probably analyze the game in ways that favor the Trojans or the Ducks but I'm no expert on college football so there's nothing to be gained there. I'll tell you, though, that it's going to be an odd feeling slapping on my green-and-yellow UO jacket and driving down to the game.

There's really no choice, though. You dance with the person who brought you and, for me, that will always be the University of Oregon. I root for USC when they play practically anybody else in the nation but, against the Ducks, they're just the other team standing in the way of our victory.

Go Ducks!

USC School of Cinematic Arts Throws a Party

The gang was all there under a hot early afternoon sun: Steven Spielberg, Robert Zemeckis and, of course, the guest of honor George Lucas. The man behind "Star Wars" -- a 1966 graduate of USC's School of Cinema-Television -- has just gifted his alma mater 175-million dollars!

Pic1_12829As an adjunct professor there this fall term (I'm teaching USC CNTV 589: "Produce or Perish"), I was there with several hundred others to hear the speeches and see the ceremonial lifting of shovels to break the ground on the new construction project. That's producer and trustee Frank Price, Dean Elizabeth Daley and University President Steven Sample all sporting hard hats along with George.

Buying naming rights is all the rage these days, of course, and Lucas got to give the school a brand new name for his chunk of change. Unlike Doritos Bowls and Tostitos Centers and Burger King Stadiums and whatnot, Lucas chose to use his influence to simplify and clarify. The new name of the USC School of Cinema-Television, effective today, is:

Cinematic_arts_logo

That's right. The USC School of Cinematic Arts. According to Lucas himself, here's the why of the name change.

“Though ‘cinematic’ was often understood in the 20th century as dealing with movies, in this century it is taking on a much broader context, looking beyond the media,” said Lucas. “I believe that the new name of the school embodies the movement of the industry and the art form, and positions all who learn here as leaders not just for the moment, but for generations to come.”

Just for the record, this is the largest private donation ever received by the university, period. For that kind of cash, USC would probably have called it Lucasville or Lucas World if he'd asked them to, so you really do have to admire the man's restraint.

As an aside to all this, one of the guests in my producing class this term talked about the illegal practice of "Block Booking" -– where a big feature film is tied to a less desirable film, forcing theater owners to take both. Back in 1977, Fox was fined $25,000 for this practice. The big feature film was "The Other Side of Midnight." The less desireable film? The one that nobody wanted? The one that theater owners had to be forced to take? Yeah, you guessed it. Some little thing called "Star Wars." From what I've seen today, this Lucas guy has done alright with it...

George Lucas has a lot on his mind about the industry. What he said to Daily Variety after the ceremony was probably more controversial and important than what he said during his time at the podium. For starters, he thinks the big tentpole mega-movie blockbuster strategy that studios are pursuing is exactly the wrong strategy. He sees a future of many, many smaller films and he's moving his own company in that direction.

The USC SCA (School of Cinematic Arts) donation puts $75 million toward the building fund for a brand-new state-of-the-art complex to house the school. The other $100 million portion of the gift will go toward support initiatives in four core areas: students, faculty and staff, technology and programming, and alumni outreach. The gift will also serve as a major catalyst for the school to reach the $200 million goal of its current endowment campaign.

Lucas_spielbergBesides the obvious positive vibes, it was a fun outdoor event, too. We lunched at standing tables on chicken or beef sandwich rolls, french fries, pasta salad and cookies. The swag du jour included newly-minted hats with the new school name on them and t-shirts. Directors -- past, present and future -- will be wearing them all over Hollywood in the weeks to come. And, yes, that's Lucas getting "hatted" by Spielberg. It reminds me that JFK had a "no hats" rule during his campaign. People kept giving him hats but he never put them on because people take pictures of you wearing them -- you never look as good as you did when you arrived -- but the goofy hat picture is what gets printed. Having said that, I'm not giving back my hat, I love the damn thing.

USC's School of Cinematic Arts really is the best of the best when it comes to an education in film and TV and new media. My son is an undergraduate there now getting a major in "Interactive Media." He's been getting a spectacular education and, now, many more students just like him are going to get an even better one. The current class I teach, for example, is in another building besides the CNTV one, mine being described by staff as "the ugliest building on campus." Maybe in a few years, we'll get to teach this thing in the hip new hacienda-style architecture of the new so-far unnamed Lucas building.

Bottom line: George Lucas has made a lot of money in his life but, even so, nobody writes a check like this one without a wince. Thanks, George. It really is a great thing you've done. And we don't care what size movies you want to make from now on, just keep making them...

USC CNTV 589 (#2) | Emmy Awards | Marshall Herskovitz, PGA President

UPDATE: Since this post, the class has come and gone. If you'd like to visit the web-site we built about producing for film and TV, please CLICK HERE.

PGA, in this context, is not the Professional Golfers Association but the Producers Guild of America. We'll get into that in a second... first a little breaking news...

Given that USC CNTV 589 is a class about producing, the Sunday Emmy Awards provided a great way to present a real-life challenge.

Imageccf74da2521a4e49bfc86dbfffa348be Those of you who saw them know that they opened with host Conan O'Brien in a video montage from top shows of the season. He started in a plane sipping champagne, crashed on the island where Hurley from "Lost" found him, went down the hatch, ended up in "The Office," did phone battle with Jack Bauer on "24," escaped into the clutches of a medical exam by "House," went into the closet with Tom Cruise on "South Park" and eventually ended up on the Emmy stage. It was a very funny bit...except...

Sunday morning, a commuter jet in Kentucky crashed killing 49 people. This made the entire plane crash opening, well, "tricky." Do you cut it from the show or just plow ahead? Emmy producer Ken Ehrlich decided to do the latter and the sequence aired. Viewers complained, especially those in Kentucky. One of our students came up with what I think was the most elegant solution. Simply edit out the interior plane crash sequence, no matter how funny it once was. Cut from Conan sipping champagne saying "What could possibly go wrong?" to him emerging from the ocean water on "Lost" island. It really was the perfect compromise.

I'm no stranger to the concept of bad news on Emmy Sunday. In 2001, after already postponing the Emmys once because of 9/11, we woke up on the re-scheduled Sunday, October 7, to realize the United States had just gone to war, and the bombing of Afghanistan had begun. We had to postpone a second time, not just for matters of taste, but because we simply were not sure that the nominees would show up. Who can afford to throw an expensive, self-congratulatory party if the guests of honor don't come?

Having said that, and back to the plane controversy, cutting that sequence could have been risky to the overall success of the show. Making too many changes, or big changes, at the last minute on a huge show, that's just asking for something to go wrong.

Anyway, our guest this week was a stand-out and, sticking to our theme, a man who has won four Emmys of his own, enjoyed a great career in the world of film, and just got himself elected President of the Producers Guild of America -- Marshall Herskovitz.

Marshallherskovitzls MARSHALL HERSKOVITZ BIO. He attended Brandeis University and then the American Film Institute, where he and Edward Zwick met in 1975 and formed their long and successful creative partnership. Following AFI, Herskovitz wrote and directed for several television series, including "Family" and "The White Shadow," until he teamed up with Zwick to create the explosive television movie "Special Bulletin" in 1983, for which  Herskovitz won two Emmys -- for best dramatic film and best writing for a dramatic film -- a Writers Guild Award, and the Humanitas Award.

In 1985, Herskovitz and Zwick created The Bedford Falls Company, named for the town in "It’s a Wonderful Life." The company’s first project was the acclaimed television series "thirtysomething." For his work on the series, Herskovitz received two more Emmy Awards, two Directors Guild Awards, a Writers Guild Award, a Humanitas award, the Golden Globe Award, the People’s Choice Award, the Peabody Award, and several others.

In 1991, Herskovitz directed his first feature film, "Jack The Bear," then two years later produced "Legends of the Fall." The following year Herskovitz and Zwick teamed up to produce the groundbreaking series "My So-Called Life," followed by "relativity" in 1995. The next year Herskovitz spent six months in Rome, producing and directing the historical epic "Dangerous Beauty."

In 1999, Herskovitz and Zwick created and executive produced the award winning series "Once and Again" for ABC.  During the show’s three year run, he and Zwick produced "Traffic," winner of two Golden Globe Awards and four Academy Awards, and "I am Sam." 

In 2003, Herskovitz co-wrote and produced "The Last Samurai," directed by Zwick.  He and Zwick are currently producing "Blood Diamond" in South Africa, which Herskovitz also co-wrote.  An active environmentalist, he has served on the board of several organizations committed to preserving America’s precious natural resources. 

Herskovitz described the same six companies that run Hollywood that Patric Verrone did in his talk last week. He called them the tinseltown equivalent of the "Five Families" and blamed them for imposing a "corporate culture" on the movie business. In his view, creativity and sanity don't always go together.

As the PGA president, however, one key aspect that recurred throughout Herskovitz’s talk was the definition of a producer.  Despite the unifying concept that producers all have to look at the whole picture while a film is being made, the precise definition differs between television and film, and there are many specific types of producers within each realm as well.

The television hierarchy (in ascending order):

  • staff writer
  • story editor
  • co-producer (often works with post-production)
  • producer (could be a line producer or a writer)
  • coordinating producer
  • supervising producer
  • co-executive producer
  • executive producer

Television shows are run by writer-producers.  A producer credit is essential for writers to move up in the hierarchy, which has led to an inflation-like phenomenon- a producing credit increasingly means less than it used to.  Most people move up one title every year, regardless of performance.  There is also the consulting producer, who is not eligible for the Emmy, and is usually a financier or studio executive. 

The film world has its own separate types of producers. The "Executive Producer" credit, for example, means the boss in TV and something different and less important in film. Herskovitz defined the different film producer titles and responsibilities as follows:

Producer:

  • engenders or develops material
  • gets the material to the studio
  • gets the director
  • participates in rewrites
  • hires key crew, helps decide on locations
  • is present on set, especially during moments of disaster
  • deals with the studio, plans the marketing, and  helps guide editing during post-production
  • stays with the project from start to finish, which often takes years

Line Producer:

  • in charge of the nuts and bolts of the production
  • hires the crew
  • handles locations
  • is on set every day
  • less prestige than a producer

Associate Producer (usually one of the following):

  • originally had the rights to the project and didn’t do much else
  • is in charge of post-production
  • is a producer learning the ropes who helps the line producer

Executive Producer

  • usually a studio executive or financier
  • title often given out to make everybody happy

Herskovitz also discussed how the Producer’s Guild is working to better define who gets which producing credits and is eligible for awards like the Oscar or the Emmy.  They publish The Producers’ Code of Credits, which defines every producing title in the TV and film business.  They give out questionnaires to credited producers and interview third-party coworkers to determine if people did the work implied by their credit.  Producers are now starting to come to the Guild to ask what they need to do to get their desired title.  A producer needs to be involved consistently across the board on a show, as financing alone is not enough to get an Oscar or Emmy-winning credit.  The Guild’s goal is to become the body that gives out producing credits of all types, starting with “produced by.” 

Herskovitz argues that the corporate structure currently being imposed on the entertainment industry is killing it.  For one thing, he explains that the industry is a terrible business model.  No other corporate structure outsources its own product- they know how to manufacture what they are making and they don’t need someone to help guide them, as a producer does in film or television.  (This leads to the issue that few truly understand what a producer’s job is, especially those who have not experienced it first-hand.)  The corporate structure also hurts the creative side of the industry, as studios and financiers become more and more risk-adverse.  This leads to huge creative limitations, as well as an onslaught of sequels and remakes.  The film industry doesn’t want to fail, which is bad for producers because it makes it more difficult for them to get films made.  Compared to the pharmaceutical industry, which Herskovitz pointed out has a similar success-to-failure ratio, the film industry does not put as much money into research and development, even though the industry wants to increase its success rate.  The corporate structure has no room for producers, which means fewer and fewer companies/producers are making more and more films.  Everybody else is forced to cut their salaries and partner with one of these few production companies.

Herskovitz clarifies that while all studios are production companies, not all production companies are studios.  He also discussed Paramount’s firing of Tom Cruise, saying that currently, top actors are getting paid 20-30% of the gross of a film on top of their multimillion-dollar salary.  This means the actors make more than the studios on a film, and the studios are struggling to make a profit.  The studios are trying to readjust these deals with actors by refusing to give actors a piece of the gross, but numerous films are falling apart as a result.

Producing is a unique career, explains Herskovitz, since you are your own boss, but you don’t own your product.  The studio finances and owns the project, but historically, for television, the network held all the power.  (Herskovitz noted that despite this power, networks tend to cycle between undercontrol and overcontrol in the creative arena.)  The television norm for a producer is that you are given an overall deal, where you a paid a guarantee by an affiliated production company.  With that guarantee comes certain responsibilities- for example, you have to try to create a TV series, or produce a particular series.  A producer with this deal is paid weekly and essentially “kept” by the studio.  Any fees paid to the producer for writing a pilot or an episode are credited against the guarantee until the producer has exceeded this floor and ends up earning more than the guarantee.

Herskovitz concluded by talking about his experiences producing "thirtysomething."  He and Ed Zwick were asked to write a TV series, but they wanted to fail at it because at that time, television was still believed to be subpar to film and they didn’t want to get stuck in it.  However, they had to write something that they would enjoy working on if it succeeded.  The result was the thirtysomething pilot, a show they were sure no network would pick up since it was essentially about them and their friends.  To their surprise, it got picked up, and they thought their lives were over.  However, these two friends and partners eventually made their peace with doing a TV show and all the compromises and limitations that went along with that, and the show ran for several seasons.  Herskovitz thinks that some of why it was so successful is because with two producers, it was harder to compromise.  When one would want to give up, the other would encourage him to keep fighting. 

Throughout his presentation, Herskovitz emphasized the balancing act that is producing.  Despite numerous disasters on every production, most of the time everything falls together at the last minute. He credits numerous invisible influences with this success, smiling and saying, “Most of the time, it just looks like a miracle.”

For a view of the one time when it really doesn't come together and no miracle is forthcoming, just pain and suffering, Herskovitz recommends the 2002 documentary, "Lost in La Mancha."

As for what Herskovitz is producing now, one of his projects is "1/4 Life" that he plans to launch on the Internet, not network TV. A producer is constantly adapting to the market forces. Change is inevitable, right?

{Thanks to student Elizabeth Johnson for taking the notes on Marshall Herskovitz's talk, and writing them up.}

A few shout-outs for jobs-well-done. Brad Crowe stepped up and did our first "pitch" and laid out the world of "Scream." It's never easy going first, but being first always gets your attention. Brad got mine, and the rest of the class as well.

And our first "round-table" was also a great start. Brian Yoshimi talked about all the sci-fi programming that's on TV these days. Michael Marshall explained why everything in Hollywood seems to be a sequel or a prequel or a graphic novel or a best-selling book. Steve Weber highlighted some successful producers who were giving back to the industry by mentoring up-and-coming talent. David Shilling raised the red flag about job safety, discussing how long crew hours are finally being addressed by the industry. Plenty to think about.

No class on September 4 because of Labor Day. Next class is September 11.

{To read all the USC CNTV 589 posts in one URL, please CLICK HERE.}

USC CNTV 589 (#1) | Patric Verrone, WGA President

UPDATE: Since this post, the class has come and gone. If you'd like to visit the web-site we built about producing for film and TV, please CLICK HERE.

The first session of the USC School of Cinema Television's CNTV 589 ("Produce or Perish!") featured Patric Verrone as our guest. Verrone is the President of the Writers Guild of America, west. As far as producing goes, Patric's been a strong presence in the field of animation where he's worked on "The Simpsons," "Futurama," "The Critic," and is currently co-executive producing "The Class of 3000." How he manages to stay so busy and still run a Hollywood trade union says a lot about his talents.

Verrone_picture PATRIC VERRONE BIO. Verrone graduated magna cum laude from Harvard College where he was an editor of "The Harvard Lampoon." He got his law degree from Boston College Law School where he served on the Boston College Law Review. He is a member of the California and Florida Bars, has been an adjunct professor of entertainment law at Loyola Law School and UCLA Extension, and has served as editor of the Annual Entertainment Law Issue of "Los Angeles Lawyer" magazine since 1996.  He has been a television writer and producer for nearly 20 years and, besides those animation credits, he's also worked on "The Tonight Show Starring Johnny Carson" and "The Larry Sanders Show." He has won two Emmys and been nominated eight times in four different categories. He won the 2002 Writers Guild Animation Caucus Lifetime Achievement Award.

All those credits are great, but the one that matters a lot to Hollywood right now is the WGA presidency. As you may recall, Verrone and a slate of like-minded candidates were just swept into office last year with an overwhelming 68% of the vote. Their agenda included a pledge to devote up to 30% of the Guild's budget to organizing writers in reality television, animation, cable, and independent film.

Mainly, though, the membership perceived Verrone and his team's interest was to force the 2007 contract negotiations to get-real. He's got all the issues on his plate -- from iPod downloads to product placement -- and the AMPTP (the group of producers that bargain collectively with the writers) is basically acting like Verrone is too hard-headed, and likely to take the union to a strike. But, as Verrone says, a strike will not be his decision to make, but will be made by the producers based on how constructively they bargain. We shall see.

Anyway, Verrone started by grabbing a dry-erase pen and basically laying out the entire schematic for how a production travels from being an idea through distribution. I've actually taken his diagram and run it through my new iMac's OmniGraffle program. We present it now in living color -- think of this as "Verrone's Vortex" -- and, students, yes, we will be discussing and testing from this. Click on this graphic and you'll see the enlarged version.

How_things_work

For an even better view, here's what the chart looks like as a JPEG file:

How Things Work 1.jpg

And, since we believe in choices, here is the same chart as a PDF file:

How Things Work 2.pdf

According to Verrone, there are basically six entities now that control most of Hollywood. They are:

  • CBS - Viacom
  • NBC - Universal
  • ABC - Disney
  • FOX - NewsCorp
  • CW - Warner Brothers - AOL/Time-Warner
  • SONY

Of these six companies, five have a TV network associated with them. Only SONY, because it is foreign owned, cannot make this claim.

Verrone argues that technology has changed the entertainment game from "Push" to "Pull."  In the traditional model, when families gathered around the TV, whatever the three networks chose to broadcast was all the choice that was available and you had to watch it when they sent it out over the airwaves. With TiVo, streaming videos, taping, and downloading, we are moving evere closer to the day when people can get any programming they want, whenever they want it.  We are all creating our own networks, and many of us are programming niches.

We also talked a bit about the world of animation where "The Simpsons" is a billion dollar industry and where Verrone has spent most of his career.

One key difference between animation and live action is often lead time. Verrone used to write for Johnny Carson where the monologue would be written in the morning that Johnny would perform that night. In contrast, "The Simpsons" season finale is being written right now (August) and won’t be shown until May.  One consequence is that the writers have to avoid the extremely current and transitory jokes in favor of material that will play in a more "evergreen" way. Another difference is how the cost of production is not as easily distorted by high actor's salaries as voice-actors rarely get the same kind of pay raises because they can easily be re-cast and the actors know it.

Verrone got a big laugh explaining how screenwriter Charlie Kaufman ("Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind," "Adaptation") decided to test the rather sweeping legal rights assignments (ownership in "this universe" and "all universes") that studios make him sign regarding his material. Kaufman apparently asked that Mars be excluded as a territory and that all profits on these anticipated Martian colonies be reserved to him. The studio refused. They wanted Mars, too! Talk about forward thinking...

{To read all the USC CNTV 589 posts in one URL, please CLICK HERE.}

{Thanks to Suzanne B. Ogden for taking the class notes this week.}

USC CNTV 589 | First Night

UPDATE: Since this post, the class has come and gone. If you'd like to visit the web-site we built about producing for film and TV, please CLICK HERE.

Until the end of December, the "For What It's Worth" blog is also going to serve as a virtual meeting place for the class I'm teaching at USC School of Cinema and Television.

Class_logo_1

It's a grad-level class, CNTV 589, about the role of the producer in the entertainment industry. Since one thing every producer knows is that a good title can go a long way to selling your project, I've re-named it from the generic "Role of the Producer" to "Produce or Perish!"

While I could probably create a separate web destination for this material, I'm electing to use this address so that more people outside of the class can share in this information. We've got some very high-caliber guests and the information they have to teach will be written up and posted within a few days of their appearances. At last night's first class, for example, our guest was Patric Verrone, the current President of the Writers Guild of America, west. His insight into the way something begins as a "property" and gets produced, distributed and exhibited was really first-rate. The WGA's contract with the AMPTP expires next year and with all the technological and content-delivery changes taking place the negotiations are expected to be ground-breaking. His comments are being word-processed now and will up on this site soon.

Next week, it's Marshall Herskovitz, the current President of the Producers Guild of America.

There are a lot of exceptionally bright grad students in this class and I've no doubt that at least some of them will be running Hollywood in a few years. I'm looking forward to getting to know them first.

And, since they say a picture is worth a thousand words and Hollywood is all about the visual media, here are a couple of ways to visually understand what a producer's life is all about...

Sleep_slide

Jump_slide_1

Ask any honest-to-God working producer. They'll all tell you they feel like one of the above pictures at least half the time.

Produce or Perish! | USC School of Cinema & Television CNTV589

UPDATE: Since this post went up, the class has come and gone. But we did build a pretty snazzy website about film and TV producing. If you want to vist, please CLICK HERE.

Exactly one month from now, on August 21, I may hear two words that will strike fear into my heart in a way that few words really can. Do you want to know what they are? Lean closer, I don't want to say them too loudly.

Professor Zabel?

Damn, I'm not sure I'm going to be able to hear that without totally and completely freaking out. It bothers me when people call me Mr. Zabel even.

Usc_cntv_logoHere's the deal. I'm actually going to be teaching a class at the University of Southern California's School of Cinema & Television. It's called "Produce or Perish!" and it's graduate level, known in the student catalogue as CNTV 589. We start August 21st and go every Monday night from 7:00p-10:00p through November 27.

Like everybody who's actually making a living at screenwriting in this town, my first response when asked was to be very leery about teaching a class because we all know that phrase: "Those that can't do, teach." On the other hand, I come from a family of teachers and it's in my blood. Besides, I'm secure about my credits, and if people with credits don't give back, that's a shame. Also, if you're going to teach anywhere, doing it at the University of Southern California's School of Cinema and Television is the place to do it. So, those are my rationalizations, and I'm sticking with them.

A producer is the driving force behind most media product being created today, including both studio and independent films, TV series, reality shows, videogames, cell-phone downloads and other emerging technologies.  The class will discuss what a producer does that is common in all formats, and define unique responsibilities in specific new forms of entertainment production.

Producing is about showing up and being involved and so, in this class, both attendance and participation will be weighted more heavily than in other classes.  Participation requires attendance, active listening and contributions to discussions. Students are expected, for examples, to have questions for guest speakers and to get engaged in discussion.

I pulled out my rolodex (okay, it's not a rolodex but my iMac "address book") and started calling and have lined up some great guests so far. They include:

  • Marshall Herskovitz, President, Producers Guild of America
  • Patric Verrone, President, Writers Guild of America
  • John Landgraf, President, F/X Network
  • David Gerber, Producer, "Flight 93"
  • Jim Parriott, Executive Producer, "Grey's Anatomy"
  • Steven Friedlander, Executive VP Distribution, Warner Independent Films
  • Don Most, Producer/Actor, "Happy Days" now directing Indie Films
  • David Hendler, CFO Sony Pictures & Television
  • Gregg Fienberg, Executive Producer, "Deadwood"
  • Eric Schotz, President, LMNO Productions
  • Daniel Tibbets, Executive VP, Go-TV
  • Rob Silverstein, Executive Producer, "Access Hollywood"
  • Dave LaFountaine, Senior VP Advertising & Promotion, Paramount Pictures
  • Peter Benedek, Partner, United Talent Agency
  • Leigh Brecheen, Entertainment Attorney, Bloom Hergott Diemer & Cook

Truth is, with guests like these, I'm probably apt to learn as much as I teach. I'm taking the class over from Gary Randall who's off shooting a movie. We had lunch together recently and he told me how rewarding he thought it was. He also told me that he had his wife, who's a sixth grade teacher, grade some of the papers for grammar and she flunked everybody.

One thing I'll be doing for the students is using this blog as a place where they can get class information, starting with this post. Also, after each Monday's class, I'll write a short blurb explaining what the guest had to say. Or, maybe, I'll have one of the students do it... yeah... that's the ticket... because, after all, that's why I called the class...

Produce or Perish!

{"For What It's Worth" offers a new way to search through previous posts. It's a one-stop-shop on a single page which you can access by CLICKING HERE. Thanks for visiting!}

Banner Design By


Search Entire Site!


  • bztv.typepad.com

Banner Design By


My Other Accounts

Facebook LinkedIn Technorati Twitter Twitter

Life 101

  • "Go confidently in the direction of your dreams, live the life you've imagined, and you'll meet with a success unexpected in common hours."

    -- Henry David Thoreau


Representation

  • STONE, MEYER, GENOW, SMELKINSON & BINDER (Neil Meyer)
    9665 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 500 Beverly Hills, CA 90212 (310) 385-9300

Hello Facebook