International Relations

Got Green?

N533184795_1218721_6956 Charlotte Safavi is an Iranian-American journalist who writes for numerous publications, including the Huffington Post

Last week as Iran's Tweet-A-Thon raged on my Facebook, an unrelated post caught my eye from an American Facebook friend, "Green twitter pictures are stupid as f***." I knew my friend did not know what the green images meant. But his comment made me stop and think.

Since the disputed election results of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's win came out of Iran on June 12, 2009, green wheels started turning on the Internet. The clamp down on international press coverage in Iran only meant green-colored avatars spread faster than the plague on the social networking sites, now operating as de factonewsrooms.

I scroll through my Facebook friends' profile pictures. Among them, I see simple statements of protest on green backgrounds: Where is My Vote? Where is Their Vote? Free Iran. I see bold graphics on green squares -- a clenched fist, the black snail-shaped map of Iran, a splatter of red. I see recent photographs with green elements -- a pair of green-ribbon bedecked fingers and thumbs forming a heart-shape, green-painted fingers making the V sign, defiant Iranians demonstrating on the streets of Iran in green clothing and accessories.

I am most touched by my American Facebook friends, many of whom are not multicultural mutts like me, who have taken on green avatars, some by green-washing their regular profile pictures. Of course, I know those who have not changed their profile pictures -- I have not -- also support the Iranians. A plea for democracy in real time spreading throughout the Web is potent and addictive.

Color for a cause is also powerful. Think of the pink ribbon of breast cancer awareness, the yellow ribbon of wanting to see loved ones home safely, the red ribbon of AIDS.

Continue reading "Got Green?" »

Green is the Color of Growth

N533184795_1218721_6956 Charlotte Safavi is an Iranian-American journalist who writes for numerous publications, including the Huffington Post

I am a child of nowhere--at least I thought so until this week. Though born in London and educated at Oxford, my heritage is Iranian. Both my parents are from Tehran, where I also spent part of my childhood. I immigrated to Los Angeles in 1985, later married an American and gave birth to an American son. When it comes to explaining my cultural identity, my head spins uncontrollably like that of Linda Blair in The Exorcist. No single country defines me, rather a combination of all three, depending on the situation. Living far from Iranian family and friends in suburban DC, Iran has been creeping lower on my totem pole.

But this week feels different. The Iranian in me is piping up. All you halves and mutts, like my son, all you multicultural schizophrenics, like me, there will come a time when parts of you come to life when you least expect them. However long or for whatever reason you suppress them, those parts of you that are from somewhere else will be at the fore.

For me, it started on Facebook. At first, the election in Iran meant little to me as an American bystander with no Iranian passport and no right to vote, except that I think a dangerous president who denies the Holocaust should be in a lunatic asylum, not running a large country.

Continue reading "Green is the Color of Growth" »

Giving Peace a Chance: Between Shalom and Salaam

MS-LaurenZabel2 If you live anywhere near Santa Barbara and you care about bringing peace to the Middle East, I'd like to invite you to come visit us at the 2009 Israeli-Palestinian Film Festival.

Hi, I'm Lauren Zabel, the Head Chair of the Event.

This year's festival is being held between Monday, May 4 and Thursday May 14.  We have a collection of films that are guaranteed to expand your horizons, make you think and see the world with just a little more perspective.  We open with "Waltz with Bashir" but keep the momentum going with 11 more truly impactful films.

Ipff2009mainflyer Please feel free to visit our website for details.

Or you can download a PDF of our flyer.

We hope you'll think of us as an organization worthy of your support.  We're student run and we appreciate whatever you can do but mostly we'd like you to come see one or more of these films.

UCSB's very own Israeli Palestinian Film Festival grew out of a tiny film club that met weekly to watch and discuss the latest and classics of Israeli cinema. Looking for a way to dive into the societies of Israel, beyond the news and the surface facts, was the main purpose for many of the club's initial members. Many had a solid understanding of Israeli history and current events, while many others were completely new to the culture and just looking for an approachable angle.

Whatever the cause, the club spawned a similar chapter when founder Herschel Colbert arrived in Santa Barbara. While not the film major or film buff he is often thought to be, Herschel took a liking to the window into daily life that films can bring and the healthy environment that UCSB fosters for debate and the Middle East. He wanted to show fellow students "the real Israel" that he lived in, not the one spoken of by both news media and university professors.

Israeli Palestinian Film Club joined forces with several on-campus organizations and departments in Spring quarter 2007 to bring to UCSB the world's first and only festival dedicated to both Israeli and Palestinian cinema. The first festival spanned an entire quarter and had highlights of the composer and ensemble of the film West Bank Story and a powerful visit by director Eytan Fox and his film Walk on Water. Now planned and run by a student committee, the festival enters its third year and we are determined to make it even better.

We are now a collaboration between the following groups: American Students for Israel, Amnesty International, Lebanese Club, The Muslim Student Association, Persian Student Group, Santa Barbara Hillel, Students for Justice in Palestine and Students for Understanding the Middle East.

We're not going to lecture you, though.  We're going to give you a film experience that you're just not going to have in a multiplex.

Hope to see you in Santa Barbara.  Our site has directions and more information.  Come early on film days and enjoy the wonderful ambience of Santa Barbara.  Springtime is truly spectacular in our wonderful town and campus.

READY TO BELIEVE: Free MP3 of Obama Fight Song!

HpzizbLast January, while we were still on strike as members of the Writers Guild of America, my wife Jackie and I sat down in a Los Angeles coffee shop with our good friend, musician Cherish Alexander.

Before the coffee was cold, we decided, improbably given the time frame -- as a couple of striking screenwriters and a singer-composer -- to write, produce and distribute the song you'll soon hear.  It happened over a five day period and we released it immediately before the California primary.

So far, "Ready to Believe" has cumulatively had its video versions viewed close to 100,000 times on YouTube.  Plus, it's available on iTunes.  You, however, don't have to buy it in the closing days of the 2008 campaign.  We want you to download it for free and to send it to your friends.

It was written to stand-up for Barack to the Clinton campaign's charges claiming he wasn't ready for the presidency.  We find that the need for this song is as solidly right-on today as it was last February (only Clinton is on the team now and the argument's being made by John McCain).  It needed rebuttal then, and it needs rebuttal now. 

Please give it a listen.  Click the link below to just hear it.  Otherwise,right-click to actually... we'll say it again... download "Ready to Believe" for free.  Again, you have our express permission to download it and to give it away. 

Download_Ready_to_Believe_Song.mp3

Some have asked for a PDF of the actual lyrics.  Here you are:

Download_Ready_to_Believe_Lyrics.pdf

Here's the You Tube version:

   

Please also visit the web-page of singer-composer Cherish Alexander (http://www.cherishalexander.com/ready_to_believe/) where all the goodies are also available.  She and fellow producer Damian Valentine did an awesome job with this project as you can hear for yourself.

We know the hour is late but if you support Barack Obama, we'd urge you to join us and expose as many people as you can to this song.  Especially Obama volunteers.  We've received a good deal of email from campaign workers who thought it was like an anthemic "fight song" for the cause.  That's certainly what we intended it to be.

Remember to vote.  Even if the polls say he's ahead, you have to vote.  Take nothing for granted. 

Still fired up and ready-to-go for Obama!

Cherish Alexander, Jackie Zabel, Bryce Zabel

Movie Smackdown Comix presents... THE 9/11 FILMS

United93_2

Two films about 9/11 were released in 2006 on the eve of the fifth anniversary of the terrorist attack.

To read the full review, go to United 93 -vs- World Trade Center.  A reader's poll has just gone up, too, so please do express your own opinion.

MOVIE SMACKDOWN! - Two Reviews... One Film... No Holds Barred!

Review and Comix by Bryce Zabel.

I'd Rather Have Been Wrong...

22iraq_slide1Hostages. It's bad enough to see the daily terrorist bombings out of Iraq, but now we have to deal with troops who are being set up for capture and God-knows-what after that. The word out of Iraq today, of course, is that U.S. aircraft dropped leaflets seeking information about three U.S. soldiers feared captured by al-Qaeda, as troops intensified the search. Of course, the al-Qaeda PR team has kindly issued a warning that the hunt will endanger the captives' lives. As if doing nothing wouldn't...   {Photo: Ahmad Al-Rubayel / AFP - Getty Images}

This is all very familiar to me because I wrote the script for this kind of terror -- for HBO, no less -- back in 2003. The pilot I wrote for them actually dealt with, among other things, the capture of American soldiers by Islamic terrorists. It also predicted the car bombings that have taken so man lives.

It all started the year before, while the war drumbeats out of Iraq were only being heard in the distance, I pitched HBO a TV series that would be set in Afghanistan at the fictional military base "Camp Big Stick." It would deal with a company of soldiers, including a group involved in psy-ops, and would be called "Hearts and Minds."

Hearts_minds

Download "Hearts & Minds" PDF

HBO works differently than the broadcast networks. Rather than order a pilot first, they ordered a "bible" about how the series would work. The executive explained the theory as being how they already knew I could write a great pilot, they wanted to know how the series would work once I had done so. Of course, it's also cheaper to order a bible than a full pilot script. So, at HBO, they would read the bible then, if they liked it, they would order the pilot script.

Continue reading "I'd Rather Have Been Wrong..." »

Iran Decides Not to Party Like It's 1979

Iran has decided to let its most recent hostages go. The 15 British sailors who've been detained in Teheran are going home. Maybe Iran has learned something from its own history. Back in 1979, Iran first took hostages, paraded them on TV, threatened to put them on trial, forced them to confess their crimes and generally behaved badly. Only instead of holding them for a couple of weeks and moving on, back then they held them for exactly 444 days.

1101791119_400
Monday, November 19, 1979

The Time magazine above, "Blackmailing the U.S." is the first issue to come out in the immediate aftermath of the Iranian hostage crisis which basically dragged on for 14 months, cost Jimmy Carter his presidency, and gave it to Ronald Reagan. Remember that it ended literally on the day Reagan took office and the Iranians knew either the hostages came home or the missiles started flying. Here's how the article began:

It was an ugly, shocking image of innocence and impotence, of tyranny and terror, of madness and mob rule. Blindfolded and bound, employees of the U.S. embassy in Tehran were paraded last week before vengeful crowds while their youthful captors gloated and jeered.

On that gray Sunday morning when 60 Americans were imprisoned by their Iranian student captors, the world changed. President Carter said at the beginning that "These last two days have been the worst I've had." Well, they didn't get better. Carter was seen as weak already, and this just made things seem even clearer to the public.

As frustration about the plight of the hostages increased, there was a sense that the Administration should do something —anything—to free them. The White House, for sound tactical and strategic reasons, rejected the military options. There were demands for the mass deportation of the 50,000 Iranian students in the U.S.—or at least those who had taken advantage of their visas to picket and demonstrate against the U.S. That was also rejected, since it would blatantly violate U.S. immigration laws. Instead, as it has had to do in a number of other recent crises, the Administration decided on restraint.

Around the U.S. though, there was the beginning of push-back. Iranian students were here in the U.S. in large numbers as the article indicated above, and they were largely out protesting against our country for letting the hated Shah of Iran in for medical treatment.

In New York City, at the close of an Iranian student demonstration, a Columbia University undergraduate shouted: "We're gonna ship you back, and you aren't gonna like it! No more booze. No more Big Macs. No more rock music. No more television. No more sex. You're gonna get on that plane at Kennedy, and when you get off in Tehran, you're gonna be back in the 13th century. How you gonna like that?" The Iranians, who stared back glumly, did not respond.

This situation was a key illustration of how the terrorism game was set up to work. One of the Iranian hostage-taking "students" was quoted in Time saying: "If the Marines don't shoot, we take over. If they do, we have our martyr. Either way, we win." Then there was the White House aide who talked like a Pentagon war gamer: "It's a classic case of gaming versus an irrational opponent. As the irrationality approaches 100%, your ability to game nears zero."

Not that I think the current leader of Iran is any more rational than Khomeini or the students were, the optimism that was felt three decades ago actually was warranted this time. Here's how it played in 1979.

Still, by week's end the Administration was feeling a bit more hopeful about the situation. Having avoided any sort of response that might have worked to the disadvantage of the hostages, the U.S. was increasingly counting on growing pressure from the international community and from Iran's own middle class to exert some influence on the religious leaders and the students. One goal of the American diplomatic strategy was to isolate Iran and make it appear as an irrational outlaw in world opinion.

I'm not sure if the Iranian hostage crisis quite rises to the "Where Were You?" level of 9/11, JFK or Challenger, but I have vivid memories. I was the weekend anchor at KVOA-TV in Tucson, Arizona and I remember reading the first wire copy, and then doing the update on the news. I worked the late shift in those days, and I also remember coming back and watching that new ABC late-night show, "America Held Hostage" with some guy named Ted Koppel who had even bigger hair than I did back then.

Yes, the times they were really changing. Time really nailed it with the very last two sentences of their article, capturing the wave of the future. Worth reading again.

However the embassy affair ends, it is a sharp reminder of the degree to which the traditional rules of international conduct can no longer be taken for granted. The world is changing; the unpredictable is becoming the commonplace.

Anyway, that's how they reported it some 28 years ago during the grand-daddy of all hostage crises.

Newsweek #1: When Roosevelt & Hitler Came to Power

I have a strange hobby. Other people collect coins, stamps, comic books, Beanie babies, you name it. I collect classic issues of Time and Newsweek magazines. This is one of the best...

74 years ago when this magazine hit the newstands, it was called Vol. I , No. 1. The exact day of release was February 17, 1933. 

Newsweek_1 The issue, all 32 pages of it, could be had for a dime, but you could get it discounted for a year's subscription at $4.  You'll also notice it was called "News-Week", not Newsweek as we know it now.

Although both Time and Newsweek have become virtually indistinguishable to the average reader these days, both had a different cover philosophy when they started.  Originally, Time was always that red-border with the famous person inside (at the beginning, always a photo).  Newsweek, in contrast, was about the week in news.  On this first cover, for example, you'll see seven pictures, each one representing a different day of the week.  Monday started off with a speech by Adolf Hitler before 15,000 in Berlin's Sports Palace where he declared "the German nation must be built up from the ground anew."   On Wednesday, for example, Franklin Roosevelt's election in the electoral college was certified by Congress. Clearly, these were monumental times for this new magazine: Hoover was out of office this week, Roosevelt was in -- and across the Atlantic, the Nazis were consolidating their grip.

Newsweek_10002 What you won't find inside is a single word about how this is a new magazine.  It pretty much just hits the ground running.  The so-called "Front Page" -- page one -- has this headline: "Easing Burdens of Debut and Foreclosure."  The first words Newsweek ever wrote are as follows:

The spectre of the auctioneer stalks throughout the land, haunting debtors in city, town and country.  Next to life itself, a home is man's most prized possession.  To save it, rugged individualism has grown gregarious, and harried citizens are banding against foreclosure.  Some are violent, grimly taking the law into their own hands.

The last word in this issue, by the way, was an article about Islam, in Turkey, where Arabic had just been officially banned.

Something I found particularly interesting in this issue, however, was commentary on the subject of democracy -- in Germany where it was under attack by Hitler, and in the United States where it was far less important than surviving the Great Depression.

The article, "A Blank Check for Roosevelt: Congress Proposes, Weighs, Then Delays Grant of Extraordinary Powers to the Next President", actually begins with a quote from Alfred E. Smith, delivered in New York the previous week. It's a whopper:

"In this depression we are in a state of war. The only thing to do now is to lay aside statutes, and do what a Democracy must do when it fights. During the World War we wrapped the Constitution of the United States in a piece of paper, put it on the shelf and left it there until the war was over."

That's quite a statement. The one that followed by James M. Cox a few days later hit the same point.

"We are at war with forces that threaten to destroy our civilization. We are a democracy. While we reflect on its virtues, it has many shortcomings. One is that in time of stress it cannot re-adjust to conditions as rapidly as necessary."

Newsweek_10001a Meanwhile, over in Germany, the newly appointed Chancellor Adolf Hitler was singing a similar tune, showing up for that Sports Arena rally in his brown Nazi uniform, "banked by blazing Nazi banners." He argued for a "break" with a "rotten brand of Democracy" and asked the German nation to "give us four years' time and then pass your judgment." Most people assumed this meant that even if the elections went badly, Hitler and his cabinet would cling to power.

Newsweek chose to print a baby picture of Hitler (it's there on the left) on its photo page which, honestly, is a very strange editorial choice. It also filed a gossipy little piece about "Hitler and Frau Wagner Coupled in Romance."

But anyhow, one of Frau Wagner's relatives says the family wouldn't be surprised to see Adolf and Winifred married "at some later date."

It's an odd read, like "Entertainment Tonight" covering the rise of fascism with bubbly enthusiasm.

Still, there's a lot of content in this magazine, crammed into its slender first volume. As a time capsule into the way we were, it's a great read.

Copy_of_instant_history_logo_2_1
To see more posts like this one, please click on the above banner.

MOVIE SMACKDOWN! | Children of Men (2006) -vs- 28 Days Later (2003)

The Smackdown. The apocalypse has gone post(al) in both of these films set in England. The action in both starts in London then moves to the country where the living is not easier. In both of these sci-fi thrillers, man's command of science and control over his environment seems to have brought with it some terrifying and unexpected consequences.

Photo_22_hires
"I read that book What To Expect When You're Expecting...twice...and none of this was in it!"

The Challenger. Just spreading now to theaters nationwide is CHILDREN OF MEN based on a book I actually read when it was first published by P.D. James. I found its central premise thrilling then, that mankind suddenly and completely goes infertile. I found the idea that if there are no people left in a few years that the sheer sadness that no one will ever hear Mozart or read Shakespeare again to be almost overwhelming. In the hands of director Alfonso Cuaron, this intellectual idea becomes gritty, dangerous and even more provocative. Clive Owen has been cast in one of his best roles here as Theo -- his face seems to register all the injustice and pain with a resignation to keep on living anyway finally giving way to a resignation to give it all up in a way that his life will have mattered.

Photo_07_hires
"When I said that being a bike messenger was a great way to meet people, this was not what I had in mind."

The Defending Champion. While it's not impossible to think that infertility could bedevil mankind, I'm not particularly worried that 28 DAYS LATER premise will come to pass. This film basically has animal activists setting some lab animals free from their cages only to set loose a "rage" virus that transmits to humans. It turns into a zombie movie then, but probably the best one I've ever seen. And I was blown away by how awesome the "empty city" shots of London were when Jim (Cillian Davis) first realizes that something has gone wildly and insanely wrong.

The Scorecard. Both of these films are structured similarly: the opening in London, important mission of survival takes them into the country, fighting off zombies or immigrants who stand in their way, giving us a black woman as a main character who seems to be the toughest of the bunch, and ending with a sense of small hope for society after scaring the crap out of us along the way. Both were directed so intensely that they deliver their particular apocalyse believably and credibly. This is a close one. CHILDREN OF MEN, however, is a film that I could actually talk my wife into seeing while 28 DAYS LATER was dismissed by her as a genre movie she had no interest in seeing. And she had a point. Although the truth is CHILDREN OF MEN is actually scarier because it feels like a lot of it could come to pass if we're not careful.

The Decision. Years from now, CHILDREN OF MEN is going to be included in the group of films that include BLADE RUNNER. 28 DAYS LATER, though, is going to be compared to films like DAWN OF THE DEAD. Despite their structural similarities, this is still apples and oranges. I just hope there will be humans alive to listen to Mozart, read Shakespeare and watch CHILDREN OF MEN. It's a close decision on points...

Ms002rrr_1

{To read more of these MOVIE SMACKDOWN reviews, please CLICK HERE.}

Ten Thoughts Inspired by the Saddam Deathwatch

1) Most days I'm opposed to the death penalty, but not this time.

271223992) The CNN anchor who asked the reporter, "How does this work? Do they just take him out back and kick over a milk crate or what?" really should be fired.

3) Why did George Bush Senior always mispronounce his name? Wasn't there somebody in the White House to correct him?

4) As far as mass murderers go, he looked better with the beard.

5) People who are worried that somehow Iraq will become more violent because he was executed are so out of touch with reality they should be ashamed of themselves.

6) It's possible to believe that the Iraq War has been a grand misadventure and still be relieved this scumbag got what he deserved.

7) Man, those Iraqis don't waste time, do they?

Dickey02 8) If he was a dictator for 35 years, then why do they keep showing that stupid picture of him with the Rocky Balboa hat and the rifle? Did they think it was more dignified than, say, the one where he was pulled out of the spider-hole with a beard longer than Moses, or the jail photos where he was in his underpants?

9) His two sons were screwed up beyond belief but how could they not have been? Did they go to their own deaths thinking he was a great dad?

10) It's such a drag for good old Gerald Ford, a decent man who believed in mercy enough that he pardoned Richard Nixon, that he have his own death associated forever with Saddam Hussein because they happened at the same time. I guess the same goes for James Brown. That just really sucks.

Thc_banner_short

Banner Design By


Search Entire Site!


  • bztv.typepad.com

Banner Design By


My Other Accounts

Facebook LinkedIn Technorati Twitter Twitter

Life 101

  • "Go confidently in the direction of your dreams, live the life you've imagined, and you'll meet with a success unexpected in common hours."

    -- Henry David Thoreau


Representation

  • STONE, MEYER, GENOW, SMELKINSON & BINDER (Neil Meyer)
    9665 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 500 Beverly Hills, CA 90212 (310) 385-9300

Hello Facebook